This review compares sequencing technologies for analyzing the subgingival microbiome, suggesting best practices for researchers.
Sequencing technologies have reshaped the study of the subgingival microbiome, but selecting the appropriate method remains challenging because of differences in resolution, cost, host DNA contamination, and computational complexity. This review compares 16S rRNA sequencing, full-length 16S, shotgun metagenomics, and metatranscriptomics with respect to taxonomic resolution, functional output, sample requirements, and analytical limitations. Key practical issues, including low microbial biomass, contamination control, and the choice of appropriate bioinformatic tools, are emphasized to help researchers avoid common pitfalls. A decision-making framework is provided to link study goals to suitable sequencing methods while outlining realistic budget and sample-handling constraints. The review concludes with recommendations for integrating sequencing with complementary techniques to improve the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical relevance of periodontal microbiome studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: