Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Develops a shorter version of the CCR scale to effectively measure rapport in human-robot interactions, indicating practical applicability for researchers.
Robots such as those serving as educational tutors, healthcare supporters, and collaborative partners must develop “rapport,” a construct that encompasses mutual understanding and interpersonal connection with people, to ensure their long-term success. In earlier work [60], we constructed, evaluated, and validated an 18-item Connection-Coordination Rapport (CCR) scale to measure human-robot rapport (Studies 1-3). Even though the full-length 18-item CCR scale measures rapport thoroughly, it may not always be practical for researchers to adopt given its relatively long length. Therefore, in this work, we developed a reduced-length version of the CCR scale that still effectively measures rapport using just 8 items. Following recommended practices for short-form development and validation, we leveraged the input of HRI experts (Study 4, \(N=30\) ) to shorten the CCR scale from 18 items to 8 items (4 items per factor). Then, we evaluated this reduced-length CCR scale on a new sample (Study 5, \(N=186\) ) where online participants watched a human-robot interaction video and evaluated it using both the full-length and reduced-length CCR scales. We validated the reduced-length CCR scale by showing that it has high internal reliability, high overlap with the full-length CCR scale, a consistent factor structure, high construct validity, and significant time savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: