PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026The New Ressourcement0 citations

The ‘Scandal of Particularity’ and Blondel’s Philosophy of History

View Full Paper
CDCathal Doherty

Key Points

  • The paper examines the relationship between historical particularity and universal significance in Blondel's philosophy.
  • Analyzes Blondel's philosophical texts on history.
  • Investigates the concept of the 'scandal of particularity.'
  • Explores the role of human action in mediating divine revelation.
  • Human action is positioned as central to philosophy over abstract thought.
  • Historical particulars and tradition are essential for understanding revelation.
  • The scandal of particularity is re-framed as a necessity in theology.

Abstract

Cathal Doherty, SJ, examines Blondel’s philosophy of history in light of the “scandal of particularity,” the tension between historical particularity and universal significance in Christian revelation. Doherty argues that Blondel situates human action, rather than abstract thought, at the center of philosophy, showing that the supernatural gift requires concrete human participation. Historical particulars, ecclesial tradition, and sacramental practice are thus indispensable mediators of divine revelation. The scandal of particularity, far from a problem, emerges as a philosophical and theological necessity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cathal Doherty (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1cd3267fb587c655f869https://doi.org/10.65172/i3o1hrh1ywacsceg
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper