This analysis identifies multifunctional riverfront designs that enhance ecological functions and public satisfaction, indicating effective climate adaptation strategies.
Although urban riverfronts have the potential to enhance climate, hydrological, ecological, and social resilience as multifunctional infrastructure, many edges remain single-purpose, focused on aesthetics or flood control. This paper presents a comparative typology and spatial analysis of multifunctional riverfronts as socio-ecological interfaces for climate adaptation. Using five case studies of Chinese riverfronts, we combine Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis, ecosystem service modelling (InVEST), hydrological simulations, and surveys (n = 972) to evaluate ecological function, temperature moderation, and public use. Three edge types are identified: ecological buffers, civic platforms, and hybrid interfaces. On average, across the five cases, hybrid edges that combine vegetated buffers with public amenities achieve ∼1.5 °C land-surface temperature cooling and 25% peak-flow attenuation relative to adjacent hard-engineered references, while recording higher satisfaction (mean ≈4.3/5) and longer stays. The MFWI framework emphasises layered design, equitable access, and interface-oriented governance to advance hydrological safety, microclimate regulation, and social inclusion. The framework offers a replicable, policy-relevant method for guiding the revitalisation of multifunctional riverfronts in urban watersheds vulnerable to climate change, supporting SDGs 11 and 13 by linking nature-based solutions to measurable adaptation performance
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: