Experimental analysis demonstrates slip recovery in robotic grasping, highlighting benefits for diverse applications.
This paper addresses the challenge of detecting and recovering from slip during robotic grasping of unknown objects, with the objective of establishing a robust no on-site or per-object calibration slip-recovery controller for an anthropomorphic hand. This hand is equipped with tri-axial piezoresistive tactile force sensors on each finger, and the proposed approach is validated through experimental analysis. The proposed methodology eliminates the need for object- or pose-specific calibration, explicit friction modelling, dense tactile arrays, line-of-sight vision, and a data-hungry learning process, enabling real-time implementation with minimal computation and integration effort. Using a commonly acquired online baseline from initial readings, slip is detected from relative changes between consecutive samples of the baseline-subtracted resultant tangential force, and object engagement is determined when the normal force reading deviates from a no-slip baseline beyond a preset threshold. Upon detecting slip, each finger increases its gripping force in closed-loop control until the slip stops, while enforcing motor-current protection in finger control to prevent actuator overload and object damage. Experiments were conducted on objects with different rigidity, weight, and surface textures, including an aluminium tube, a plastic water bottle, and a sponge. Additionally, the response time and variations in gripping force were evaluated. The results demonstrate rapid slip response via localized per-finger correction, good object conformability, and effective re-stabilization under different lifting speeds and sudden external disturbances. The per-finger design utilizes the minimum necessary correction at the offending finger, reducing unnecessary force increases on other fingers and improving grasp efficiency. This approach represents a practical solution for warehouse picking, human–robot collaboration, and in situ manipulation where task-specific calibrations, visual access, or training datasets are impractical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: