Retrospective study finds high-risk HPV prevalence in young and older women, suggesting targeted prevention strategies.
Introduction: This study investigated the epidemiological characteristics, subtype distribution, and clinical correlations of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in Jingmen, China. Methodology: A retrospective study of 5,155 women screened at Jingmen Central Hospital (2022–2024). The participants were categorized into 6 age groups: ≤ 20 years (n = 54), 21-30 years (n = 791), 31-40 years (n = 1,757), 41-50 years (n = 1,371), 51-60 years (n = 968), and ≥ 61 years (n = 214). HPV genotyping and histopathology were used to assess infection patterns and lesion correlations. Results The infection rates of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV), low-risk HPV (LR-HPV), and mixed infections were 18.10% (933/5,155), 3.38% (174/5,155), and 3.38% (174/5,155), respectively. HR-HPV infections exhibited a bimodal age distribution, with peak prevalence in women aged ≤ 20 years (33.33%) and ≥ 61 years (39.25%). This age-related difference was statistically significant (χ² = 81.430, p < 0.001). The dominant subtypes were HPV52 (23.5%), HPV16 (13.9%), and HPV58 (13.3%). Notably, HPV16 was significantly more prevalent in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL; 44.3%) and cervical cancer (CC; 55.5%), compared with low-grade lesions (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study identified both adolescent/young women (≤ 20 years) and older women (≥ 61 years) as high-risk populations for HR-HPV infection. Notably, HPV16 (55.5%) exhibited significantly higher detection rates in cervical cancer cases, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing this subtype in region-specific vaccine-based prevention strategies. These findings underscore the need for tailored clinical management approaches based on viral subtype distribution and lesion severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: