Follow-up study examines kinematic adaptations due to fatigue in different running technique clusters, indicating tailored training approaches.
Fatigue-related changes in running technique may depend on a runner’s preferred style. Understanding these changes can inform targeted training to enhance performance. In previous work, we identified two technique-based clusters of runners: the “neutral pelvis” and the “tilted pelvis” clusters. This follow-up study examined whether fatigue induces cluster-specific technique adaptations. Sixty runners (neutral pelvis, n = 32; tilted pelvis, n = 28) completed a treadmill run to exhaustion at 5% above their individual lactate threshold speed. Stride frequency, duty factor, trunk and lower limb kinematics were compared between clusters at the start, middle, and end of the run using a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). All runners reached exhaustion in ∼20 minutes, covering ∼5 km. Runners from the tilted pelvis cluster consistently showed greater trunk-to-pelvis extension, more pelvic anterior tilt and greater hip flexion, and a smaller duty factor compared with the neutral pelvis cluster throughout the run. Fatigue-related adaptations were similar across clusters: reduced stride frequency, increased duty factor, greater trunk flexion during stance, increased plantar flexion, and higher coordination variability (trunk-to-pelvis–hip, hip–knee, knee–ankle) during swing. Although fatigue affected both groups similarly, the underlying technique differences suggest these adaptations may have distinct mechanical or performance consequences. Understanding such cluster-specific responses can help coaches tailor training and fatigue management strategies to individual running styles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivadulla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: