PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences1 citationsOpen Access

Mathematical modelling of Wolbachia replacement in Aedes aegypti for dengue control: a scoping review

View Full Paper
KTKatie TileyUniversity of LondonLYLaith YakobKOK. O'ReillyUniversity of London

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the development and effectiveness of mathematical models for Wolbachia replacement in controlling dengue transmission.
  • Conducted a scoping review of Wolbachia replacement models in dengue control.
  • Analyzed 115 studies based on inclusion criteria from 726 search results.
  • Extracted research questions, findings, and methodologies from the studies.
  • Categorized research themes related to Wolbachia characteristics and environmental factors.
  • Identified cytoplasmic incompatibility and maternal transmission as crucial for successful Wolbachia fixation.
  • Less than 20% of models used empirical data for parameterizing critical characteristics.
  • Outbreaks may occur despite fixation, with few models considering heterogeneous epidemiological outcomes.
  • Highlighted the necessity for empirical parameterization and complexity in future modelling efforts.

Abstract

Abstract Wolbachia replacement in dengue virus vectors is a promising tool for controlling transmission, and models can explore its potential in novel and complex scenarios. We analyse how research questions in Wolbachia replacement modelling have developed over time and in response to empirical findings. A scoping review was conducted of Wolbachia replacement models. For each study, we extracted research questions, key findings and modelling methodology and thematically categorized research questions. From 726 search results, 115 studies met inclusion criteria. Four themes were identified: identifying key Wolbachia characteristics (n = 61, 53.0%), investigating effects of environmental heterogeneity (n = 21, 18.3%), estimating epidemiological impact (n = 25, 21.7%) and exploring Wolbachia replacement in combination with other arboviral control measures (n = 8, 7.0%). Models identify cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) and maternal transmission (MT) as key for fixation success. However, less than 20% (n = 6) of studies parameterize CI and MT using empirical sources. Although models agree outbreaks may occur with fixation, few explore epidemiological outcomes of heterogeneous Wolbachia fixation or combined vector control. These findings highlight the need for empirical parameterization and incorporating environmental complexity for models to remain insightful for decision-making. Policymakers would benefit from future models exploring heterogeneous coverage and combined control strategies, given evidence of context-specific outcomes and diverse control tools.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tiley et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d8c5be6419ac0d528echttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2952
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper