Research compares drying methods for Ziziphus jujuba fruits, showing how they affect quality, implying better drying choices for preservation.
BACKGROUND This study investigates the effects of three different drying methods – sun drying, shade drying and oven drying at 55 °C. Some physical, structural and chemical properties of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. fruit before and after drying are evaluated. Freshly harvested jujube fruits from the Elazığ (Turkey) region are subjected to each drying method, and changes in surface hardness, moisture content and internal structure are analyzed. Shore A hardness measurements indicate a significant increase in fruit firmness over time, with oven‐dried samples showing the highest values, followed by sun‐dried samples. RESULTS Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy reveals marked chemical transformations during drying, including reductions in OH stretching bands and shifts in CO and CH regions, reflecting moisture loss and modifications in sugars and polysaccharides. Weight loss calculations determine that approximately 60–65 wt% of initial mass is lost to reach a final moisture content of around 16–18 wt%. These structural and chemical changes influence the fruit's texture, rehydration ability and consumer acceptability. Drying kinetic modeling using two‐term models for both oven and sun/shade drying demonstrates excellent fit ( R 2 = 0.9995), with oven drying showing a higher effective diffusion coefficient ( D eff = 4.57 × 10 −10 m 2 s −1 ) than sun/shade drying ( D eff = 7.96 × 10 −11 m 2 s −1 ), indicating more efficient moisture transport. CONCLUSION Response surface methodology is employed to optimize drying conditions and evaluate mass loss over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: