This letter proposes a new approach to cancer by emphasizing dynamic interactions and holistic therapies, suggesting better outcomes.
Cancer research has long been dominated by a gene-centric, substantialist ontology that reduces the disease to static mutations, overlooking its dynamic, relational nature. This letter proposes a processual ontology, inspired by Alfred North Whitehead’s philosophy, to reframe cancer as a system of interactions across genetic, epigenetic, and environmental scales. Evidence highlights non-genetic plasticity in resistance, tissue context in tumor behavior, and ancient survival programs in cancer’s origins. Shifting to this perspective fosters holistic research and adaptive therapies, offering a more comprehensive understanding of cancer’s complexity and promising improved outcomes beyond traditional models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mesut Tez (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: