Derives rest mass from spectral gaps in non-commutative algebra, implying a new structural understanding of mass.
This paper provides a structural definition of rest mass m0 as the operational latency induced by the spectral gap of the minimal non-commutative algebra M3(C). Definition: m0 := κ·|λi - λ̄|, where λi are eigenvalues of normalized M ∈ M3(C), λ̄ is their arithmetic mean, and κ = ℏ/(c·ℓP) is the dimensional conversion factor with ℓP the minimal operational length scale derived from the metric structure axiom of Cognitional Mechanics. The spectral gap |λi - λ̄| is invariant under unitary conjugation, establishing it as a basis-independent structural quantity. Four fundamental forces contribute to m0 through different projections of this gap: non-commutative constraints (strong force) contribute ~99% to hadronic mass, diagonal trace components (electromagnetic) ~1%, eigenvalue transitions (weak force) <0.1%, and background modulation (gravity) provides uniform scaling. The necessity of three fermion generations follows from M3(C) minimality (n = 3 required for metric triangulation and spectral stability). Mass hierarchy corresponds to spectral excitations with characteristic scale δ = √(3/2). Numerical results: α⁻¹ = 137.0359 (relative error 0.004% vs CODATA); muon g-2 anomaly consistent with Cognitional Mechanics prediction; proposed ISS orbital test Δ(α⁻¹) = +0.0002. The Higgs mechanism is reinterpreted as explaining trace-component excitations (~1% of hadronic mass), with the 125 GeV resonance corresponding to Tr(F) ≠ 0 perturbations. The dominant 99% contribution arises from non-commutative operational constraints. This definition requires no new particles or extra dimensions and preserves all Standard Model predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T.O. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: