This research compares biomarker maturity in spa and natural peloids, suggesting insights for organic matter evaluation.
Peloid maturation is governed by geological settings, duration of water–sediment interaction (microbial reworking), and thermomineral water properties, with molecular distributions providing insights into transformation mechanisms. To assess site-specific biomarker maturity, geochemical parameters were applied to five Serbian therapeutic muds, including spa peloids (Bujanovac, Jošanica, Kanjiža) and natural systems (Vrujci, Rusanda). Mineralogy was determined via X-ray diffraction, and organic matter (OM) was characterized by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry of n-alkanes, steranes and hopanes. Samples are mostly clay-rich, providing favorable catalytic conditions for biomarker transformations. Bujanovac shows a higher plant OM signature (n-C29 maximum) and elevated biomarker maturity (high Ts/Tm, near-equilibrium C29 S/(S + R)), likely inherited from volcanically influenced source material. Jošanica exhibits high CPI but low Ts/Tm and C29 S/(S + R), indicating largely immature OM despite four years of spa aging. Kanjiža shows unexpectedly high apparent maturity after one-day aging, with a pronounced UCM and C31 S/(S + R) (0.58), consistent with incorporation of migrated petrogenic hydrocarbons. Vrujci displays coherent maturity due to prolonged water–sediment interaction, clay-rich mineralogy, extended aging, and regional geothermal gradients. Rusanda exhibits decoupled parameters (CPI 3.91, C29 S/(S + R) 0.69), indicative of hydrocarbon overprinting. Overall, integrating biomarker geochemistry with mineralogy, depositional context, and local thermal/geological conditions provides a robust framework to evaluate peloid maturation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vukićević et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: