PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Retina0 citations

Focal Choroidal Excavations in a Screening Cohort: Fundus Visibility and Structural Remodeling in Younger Adults

View Full Paper
EKEunAh KimSSSu Jeong Song

Key Points

  • To explore the relationship between fundus visibility and morphological features of focal choroidal excavation in a health-screening cohort.
  • Analyzed data from 19,048 individuals undergoing health examinations with spectral-domain OCT and fundus photography.
  • Classified focal choroidal excavations as fundus-visible or fundus-invisible.
  • Performed a 1:2 propensity score matching by age and sex between FCE and non-FCE controls.
  • Employed generalized estimating equations to analyze lesion characteristics and ocular parameters.
  • Identified 252 focal choroidal excavation lesions in 192 participants (1.0%).
  • FCE group had significantly lower intraocular pressure (IOP) and greater choroidal thickness compared to matched controls.
  • Fundus-visible lesions exhibited larger median horizontal diameter and depth than fundus-invisible lesions.
  • Visible lesions were located closer to the fovea and showed higher rates of steep slopes and outer nuclear layer thickening.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine how fundus visibility relates to optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived morphologic and topographic features of focal choroidal excavation (FCE) and to evaluate systemic and ocular associations in a health-screening cohort. Methods: We analyzed 19,048 individuals undergoing health examinations with spectral-domain OCT and fundus photography. FCEs were classified as fundus-visible or fundus-invisible. A 1:2 propensity score matching (age/sex) was performed to compare participants with FCE against non-FCE controls. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze lesion characteristics, systemic comorbidities, and ocular parameters including intraocular pressure (IOP), choroidal thickness, and macular degeneration. Results: We identified 252 FCE lesions in 192 participants (1.0%). Compared to matched controls, the FCE group showed no significant differences in systemic comorbidities but had significantly lower IOP ( P = 0.026), greater choroidal thickness ( P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of macular degeneration ( P = 0.002). Among FCEs, fundus-visible lesions had greater median horizontal diameter (681.0 vs 518.0 µm; P < 0.001) and depth (69.5 vs 45.0 µm; P < 0.001), were located closer to the fovea (611.5 vs 1385.0 µm; P < 0.001), and exhibited higher rates of steep slopes (62.5% vs 42.7%; P = 0.002) and outer nuclear layer thickening (61.7% vs 31.5%; P < 0.001) compared to fundus-invisible lesions. Conclusion: FCE is associated with distinct ocular profiles, including lower IOP and increased choroidal thickness, independent of systemic risk factors. Fundus visibility indicates larger, deeper, and paramacular lesions with specific structural alterations, underscoring the need to recognize subtle fundoscopic irregularities for early OCT detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e925be6419ac0d5469bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper