Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates how energy utilization efficiency influences melt pool dimensions and tensile properties in 316L stainless steel, indicating new optimization routes.
Energy density is a common but often inadequate parameter for predicting properties in laser additive manufacturing, as it fails to capture complex energy absorption dynamics. This study introduces energy utilization efficiency as a governing factor for melt pool characteristics in laser directed energy deposition (LDED) of 316L stainless steel. We demonstrate that at a constant energy density, energy utilization efficiency varies significantly with process parameters, ranging from conditions that cause lack-of-fusion to those that promote porosity. Experimentally, increasing energy utilization efficiency under constant energy density (90 J/mm) led to a five-fold increase in melt pool depth and a doubling of its area. This shift in energy utilization efficiency directly influenced tensile properties, with samples at moderate energy utilization efficiency achieving optimal yield strength (~428 MPa), ultimate tensile strength (~583 MPa), and elongation (~51.6%). Quantitative strengthening analysis revealed that dislocation strengthening contributed approximately 60% of the total yield strength, but its contribution decreased with excessive energy utilization efficiency due to grain coarsening. To overcome the limitations of energy density, we propose normalized enthalpy as a predictive design parameter. It shows a strong linear correlation with melt pool width, depth, and area, effectively integrating both process inputs and material thermal response. This work provides a fundamental insight into energy–material interactions and offers a physics-enhanced predictive tool that complements conventional energy density metrics for optimizing the LDED process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: