PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Dermatologic Therapy0 citationsOpen Access

New Advances in Biologic Treatment for Malignant Atrophic Papulosis: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
JLJia-Wei LiuXMXiao MaDMDonglai Ma

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various biologics in treating malignant atrophic papulosis (MAP).
  • Systematic search of Scopus, Embase, and PubMed databases.
  • Inclusion of cases involving biologics for MAP treatment.
  • Analysis of six different biologics used for MAP.
  • Eculizumab showed the highest response rate at 76.5%.
  • Rituximab exhibited inconsistent outcomes.
  • Tocilizumab and natalizumab showed limited efficacy.
  • TNF inhibitors may exacerbate disease.

Abstract

Background Malignant atrophic papulosis (MAP) is the systemic subtype of Degos disease, characterized by high lethality. Currently there is no standardized treatment protocol. Steroids and immunosuppressive therapies result in limited effectiveness. Biologic treatments offer promising therapeutic potential for MAP and significantly improve prognosis. Aims This review aims to systematically evaluate the applications of various biologics in the treatment of MAP and to explore their potential efficacy. Methods We systematically searched three electronic databases (Scopus, Embase, and PubMed) from inception to November 30, 2025. All cases involving biologics for the treatment of MAP were included and analyzed. Results A total of six different biologics have been utilized in the treatment of MAP. Among all the biologics, eculizumab demonstrated the highest response rate, reaching 76.5% ( n = 13/17). The use of rituximab has yielded inconsistent outcomes in the treatment of MAP. Neither tocilizumab nor natalizumab demonstrated satisfactory therapeutic efficacy, while the use of TNF inhibitors may result in disease exacerbation. Conclusion Eculizumab is recommended as a potential salvage therapy, and its combination with treprostinil may result in longer disease remission time. TNF inhibitors should be avoided in patients with MAP. More studies are needed to assess the long‐term safety and efficacy of biologics in the treatment of MAP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54c72https://doi.org/10.1155/dth/6276060
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper