Key result
Device-assisted Valsalva boosts immediate SVT cardioversion success to ~63% vs standard maneuver.
Why the study?
Although the Valsalva maneuver is the guideline-directed emergent treatment for SVT, its success rate remains suboptimal.
Does a device-assisted Valsalva maneuver improve immediate cardioversion success compared to standard Valsalva maneuver in patients with supraventricular tachycardia?
RCT (n=212)
Open-label
No
Does a device-assisted Valsalva maneuver improve immediate cardioversion success compared to standard Valsalva maneuver in patients with supraventricular tachycardia?
A handheld Valsalva assist device significantly improves the rate of immediate sinus rhythm restoration compared to the standard Valsalva maneuver in patients with supraventricular tachycardia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports device-assisted Valsalva as preferred initial SVT maneuver; extends prior VM evidence with RCT confirmation.
Importance Although Valsalva maneuver (VM) remains the guideline-directed emergent treatment for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), its success rate remains suboptimal. Objective To assess the efficacy of a novel handheld Valsalva assist device, which can assist in achieving and maintaining target intrathoracic pressures, in improving sinus rhythm restoration rates in patients with SVT. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at Beijing Anzhen Hospital randomized patients with SVT (aged 16-80 years, enrolled between April 2022 and April 2023) undergoing electrophysiological study at a tertiary hospital. Data analysis was completed from January 2024 to January 2025. Intervention Participants received either device-assisted VM (n = 106) or standard VM (n = 106) during induced SVT. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was immediate cardioversion success (12-lead electrocardiogram-confirmed sinus rhythm within 1 minute) postintervention by intention-to-treat analysis. Results A total of 212 patients were randomized, among whom 210 completed the randomly assigned VM and were included in the primary analysis (106 in the standard VM group and 104 in the device-assisted VM group). Mean (SD) patient age was 48.4 (14.0) years, and 114 patients (54.8%) were female. After 2 VMs, 67 of 106 participants in the VM with device assist group (63.2%) vs 31 of 106 participants in the standard VM group (29.2%) converted to sinus rhythm within 1 minute (odds ratio, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.36-7.47; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this randomized clinical trial, the handheld Valsalva assist device significantly enhances VM effectiveness, providing a potentially implementable solution for SVT management. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622772
Huang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (n=212). Device-assisted Valsalva maneuver vs. Standard Valsalva maneuver was evaluated on Immediate cardioversion success (12-lead electrocardiogram-confirmed sinus rhythm within 1 minute) postintervention (OR 4.16, 95% CI 2.36-7.47, p=<0.001). Device-assisted Valsalva maneuver improved immediate cardioversion success compared to standard maneuver in SVT patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: