Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework predicts train stopping distances, suggesting improvements in safety assessments.
This paper proposes a physics-informed Bayesian framework for virtual testing and predictive modeling of train performance, specifically addressing stopping-distance prediction. The approach unifies physical simulation models with data-driven statistical inference to achieve uncertainty-aware predictions under limited or noisy measurements. By embedding governing equations of motion into a hierarchical Bayesian structure, the method systematically accounts for both model-form and data uncertainty, allowing explicit decomposition into aleatoric and epistemic components. A Gaussian process surrogate is employed to efficiently emulate high-fidelity physics simulations while preserving key dynamic behaviors and parameter sensitivities. The Bayesian formulation enables probabilistic calibration and validation, providing predictive distributions and confidence bounds. As a representative application, the framework is applied to the virtual prediction of train stopping distances, demonstrating how the proposed methodology captures nonlinear braking dynamics and quantifies uncertainty in safety-relevant performance metrics directly compatible with statistical verification standards such as EN 16834. The results confirm that the physics-informed Bayesian approach enables accurate, interpretable, and standards-aligned virtual testing across a wide range of dynamical systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sepahvand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: