Key result
Jun11787 and Jun11695 halt paralysis progression and lower spinal viral titers in EV-D68 infected mice.
Why the study?
Enterovirus D68 causes severe neurological complications such as acute flaccid myelitis and death in children, but no vaccine or antiviral is currently available.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.4% vs 7.6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
The rationally designed capsid inhibitors Jun11787 and Jun11695 demonstrate potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral efficacy against EV-D68, representing promising leads for treating EV-D68-induced acute flaccid myelitis.
May support capsid inhibitor development for EV-D68; leaves open translation from neonatal mice to humans.
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is a respiratory virus that causes neurological complications such as acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) and death in children. No vaccine or antiviral is available for EV-D68. We report the structure-based design of the EV-D68 VP1 capsid inhibitors with in vivo antiviral efficacy in a neonatal mouse model of EV-D68-associated paralytic myelitis. Cryo-EM structures show that Jun11787 and Jun11695 bind the hydrophobic canyon region in VP1 and display nanomolar potency against multiple EV-D68 strains and single-digit micromolar potency against EV-A71 and CVB3 in vitro. Jun11787 and Jun11695 also significantly reduce the spinal cord viral titer, prevent the progression of paralysis, and improve weight gain in EV-D68-infected male and female mice when treatment is initiated immediately, 24 h, and even 4-6 days post-infection. Overall, Jun11787 and Jun11695 represent promising leads for treating EV-D68 infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infection. Jun11787 and Jun11695 vs. Control (corn oil) was evaluated on Paralysis score (24-hour delayed treatment model) (p=<0.0001). Jun11787 and Jun11695 significantly prevented the progression of paralysis and reduced spinal cord viral titers in a neonatal mouse model of EV-D68 infection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: