Case report examines jet lag effects on performance in a world-class Paralympic athlete, suggesting tailored monitoring strategies are needed.
Introduction This case report aimed to examine the effects of long-haul eastward transmeridian travel on neuromuscular performance, subjective well-being, and internal training load in a World-class female Paralympic shot-putter preparing for the Paris 2024 Paralympic Games. Methods An F54-class athlete was monitored for 21 days surrounding a flight from Chile to France (eastward, six time zones). Daily assessments included handgrip strength (HGS), shot-put throwing distance, subjective well-being, and session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE). Descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlation were used to explore relationships between performance and physiological/subjective variables. Results Transient reductions in HGS occurred for 3–4 days post-travel, followed by daily fluctuations. Jet lag and fatigue scores were elevated during the first post-travel days but showed progressive improvement, returning to near-baseline levels by approximately two weeks before competition. Throwing performance showed a moderate positive correlation with left-hand HGS ( ρ = 0.52, p = 0.032) and a negative correlation with s-RPE ( ρ = –0.56, p = 0.018). Gastrointestinal disruptions, particularly in stool frequency and consistency, persisted longer than other subjective variables. Conclusion Long-haul transmeridian travel was associated with transient neuromuscular and perceptual disturbances in a world-class Paralympic athlete. HGS and s-RPE emerged as practical and responsive markers of travel-induced fatigue and performance readiness during the 21-day period surrounding international travel. These findings highlight the need for individualized monitoring strategies during the travel adaptation period in elite Paralympic sport contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia-Carrillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: