Key result
Exercise snacking improves arterial stiffness, muscle mass, and resistin versus moderate-intensity training in obese students.
Why the study?
The effects of exercise snacking on body composition, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and serum resistin in obese young adults were not well established.
Does an exercise snacking protocol improve body composition, arterial stiffness, and serum resistin compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in obese college students?
Population
50 male and 50 female college students with BMI ≥28 kg / m²
Comparison
Exercise snacking vs moderate-intensity continuous training
Follow-up
12 wk
Authors
Loading...
Exercise snacking may improve arterial stiffness and muscle mass more than MICT in obese students; leaves open confirmation in larger randomized trials.
Does an exercise snacking protocol improve body composition, arterial stiffness, and serum resistin compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in obese college students?
p-value: p=<0.01
An exercise snacking protocol incorporating short HIIT sessions is more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training at improving arterial stiffness and skeletal muscle mass in obese college students.
Jun Yu (2026) studied Obesity (n=100). Exercise snacking (ES) vs. Moderate-intensity, continuous training (MICT) (45 min of running at maximal fat-burning intensity daily) was evaluated on Body composition, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and serum resistin (p=<0.01). A 12-week exercise snacking protocol significantly improved skeletal muscle mass, arterial stiffness, and serum resistin in obese college students (p<0.01), unlike moderate-intensity training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: