Background Cerebrovascular events are a potentially serious complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with intracranial involvement. However, diagnosing GCA in this context remains challenging, as classical clinical features may be absent. Objectives To identify characteristic cerebellar infarct patterns associated with intracranial GCA and to differentiate them from other common causes of posterior circulation stroke. Design Multicenter retrospective study. Methods A total of 125 patients with cerebellar infarctions of various etiologies were included. Among these, 19 patients had confirmed intracranial GCA. Infarct patterns were compared to those seen in strokes of cardioembolic origin (n = 42), arterio-arterial embolism from proximal vertebral artery atherosclerosis (n = 13), local atherosclerotic stenosis of the V4 segment (n = 21), and vertebral artery dissection (n = 30). Infarct topography was assessed using acute-phase diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for individual imaging features. Results Distinct imaging signatures were observed in patients with GCA. A "corona-like" infarct pattern, defined by sparing of the medial branch of the proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), demonstrated a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%. A patchy infarct pattern, characterized by scattered non-confluent lesions, was present in 53% of GCA cases and showed high specificity (93%). When both features were present, specificity increased to 98% and sensitivity was reduced to 47%. Conclusion Our findings reveal a distinct cerebellar infarct pattern associated with intracranial GCA, characterized by a corona-like configuration and patchy lesions predominantly involving the lateral PICA territory. Recognition of this imaging phenotype may enhance diagnostic accuracy in challenging cases and facilitate the timely initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.
Beuker et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: