Experimental tests reveal increased energy dissipation and changing failure mechanisms in marble under cyclic loading, indicating implications for underground stability.
Deep rock masses often experience complex cyclic loading during excavation; however, their failure mechanisms under true-triaxial stress states remain inadequately understood. This study examines the anisotropic deformation, failure mechanisms, and damage evolution of marble through true-triaxial cyclic loading and unloading tests under different intermediate principal stress differences ( λ ). Results show that the plastic strain increment ratio is larger in the σ 3 -direction than in the σ 2 -direction, and volumetric dilation is predominantly governed by strain in the σ 3 -direction. The peak strength and crack damage stress conform to the linear Mogi strength criterion, while the peak dilation angle exhibits a V-shaped trend with increasing λ . The failure mode transitions from splitting tensile failure to tension-shear mixed failure as λ increases from 0 to 90 MPa, accompanied by a decrease in fracture angle from 83° to 63°. Energy dissipation follows a concave-up trend, with energy storage in the σ 1 - and σ 2 -directions increasing as λ rises. Acoustic emission (AE) activity intensifies near the peak stress during each cycle, and the AE b -value fluctuates before a sharp decline. Both the sharp drop in the AE b -value and the occurrence of the Felicity effect (at > 88% peak stress) are recognized as critical precursors to instability. Furthermore, both energy-based and strain-based damage variables exhibit a three-stage growth pattern and are well described by the Logistic growth model. A higher λ delays rapid damage accumulation and enhances rock stability. Accordingly, a comprehensive damage model integrating energy-based continuity and AE sensitivity is proposed for stability prediction in deep underground engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: