Qualitative study examines emotional strains and coping mechanisms in ZAKA volunteers, highlighting resilience implications.
Introduction This qualitative study characterizes the moral-psychological and existential dynamics of 24 ZAKA volunteers during the “Iron Swords” war. It focuses on how the encounter between extreme trauma and a supreme moral-Halakhic mandate (“Chesed Shel Emet”) shapes trauma processing. Methods Through in-depth semi-structured interviews, the research examined the volunteers’ experiences of the October 7, 2023, events, their emotional difficulties, and the tension between memory and forgetting. Results Four core themes were identified: sensory and emotional overload leading to internal conflict, the role of social support as a pillar for resilience, the “tightrope walk” between memory as a mission and oblivion as a coping mechanism, and the significance of commemoration as a source for Post-Traumatic Growth (PTG). Discussion The findings indicate that the Halakhic commitment functions as a unique cultural-religious mediating variable. While it intensifies the risk of Moral Injury due to helplessness, it simultaneously serves as a stable collective meaning anchor that drives a resilient Collective PTG Identity. This study offers critical clinical and ethical insights for emergency organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oren Cohen Cohen Zada (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: