Review synthesizes hydrogel-enhanced brachytherapy, improving tumor response in cervical cancer, suggesting a shift in treatment paradigms.
Cervical cancer remains a major global health challenge, with over 600,000 new cases and 340,000 deaths annually, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries, where gaps in screening and access to advanced therapies sustain high morbidity and mortality. Standard treatment for locally advanced disease relies on radiotherapy-particularly brachytherapy-which delivers highly conformal, high-dose radiation directly to tumors. However, conventional brachytherapy is limited by a narrow therapeutic window: the proximity of radiosensitive organs, tumor hypoxia, immunosuppressive stroma, and anatomical variability restrict dose escalation and compromise tumor control. Hydrogel-based biomaterials have emerged as a transformative solution. Serving simultaneously as organ-protective spacers, localized radiosensitizers, and multifunctional drug delivery platforms, hydrogels enable precision-guided modulation of the tumor microenvironment while protecting adjacent tissues. Advanced designs-including injectable, implantable, stimulus-responsive, and 3D-printable hydrogels-allow patient-specific, tumor-targeted interventions that synergize brachytherapy with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or nanoparticle-based radiosensitizers. Preclinical and early clinical studies demonstrate improved tumor response, reduced radiation-induced toxicity, and expanded therapeutic windows. This review synthesizes the mechanistic rationale, preclinical evidence, and clinical experience of hydrogel-assisted brachytherapy. By bridging materials science and oncology, hydrogel platforms represent a paradigm shift-safely expanding the therapeutic window, enhancing tumor eradication, and minimizing toxicity in cervical cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moradpanah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: