The spatial and temporal conflicts within terminal maneuvering areas, particularly in multi-airport systems, are growing increasingly complex. Traditional independent processing methods face inherent limitations when dealing with multi-source uncertainties, dynamic weather conditions, and high-density operations. This paper proposes MSTAGNN-MARL that systematically integrates the resolution of spatial conflicts and temporal scheduling issues. This framework is based on four crucial innovations: First, a strategic-tactical-execution hierarchical architecture is constructed that integrates multi-criteria decision optimization with graph neural network-based multi-agent reinforcement learning. Second, an uncertainty perception mechanism is designed that explicitly encodes conflict features as dynamic edge attributes in social graphs, incorporating a real-time dynamic weather model and a Gaussian noise-based perception uncertainty model. Third, develop a compliance automated system for behavior cloning that learns the decision preferences of controllers to achieve human–machine collaboration and provide transparent visualization. Fourth, a robustness assurance mechanism for abnormal scenarios is constructed, employing behavior tree-driven emergency strategies to handle unexpected situations. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an 89.3% conflict resolution rate, reduces average delays by 6 min compared to existing methods, and exhibits robust performance under varying traffic densities and dynamic weather conditions. Ablation experiments validate the effectiveness of the four innovations. This framework provides a new research paradigm for scheduling and decision-making in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ershen Wang
Haolong Xu
Nan Yu
Aerospace
Shenyang Aerospace University
Civil Aviation Administration of China
Civil Aviation Management Institute of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699010df2ccff479cfe57336 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13020175
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: