Traditional machine learning models for concrete compressive strength prediction provide only single-value estimates without quantifying the probability of meeting design requirements, leaving engineers unable to make risk-informed decisions. This study addresses this critical limitation by developing a novel probabilistic prediction framework that integrates explainable machine learning with Copula-based joint distribution modeling. Using a dataset of 1030 concrete samples with curing ages ranging from 1 to 365 days, we first established an XGBoost 2.1.4 prediction model achieving R2 = 0.9211 (RMSE = 4.51 MPa) on the test set. SHAP 0.49.1 (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified curing age (33.3%) and water–cement ratio (28.8%) as the dominant features, together accounting for 62.1% of predictive importance. These two controllable engineering parameters were then selected as core variables for probabilistic modeling. The key innovation lies in integrating Copula-based dependence modeling with explainable machine learning (XGBoost–SHAP) to quantify the compliance probability of concrete strength under specific mix designs and curing conditions, thereby supporting risk-informed quality control decisions. Through systematic comparison of five Copula families (Gaussian, Student t, Clayton, Gumbel, and Frank), we identified optimal dependence structures: Gaussian Copula (ρ = −0.54) for the water–cement ratio–strength relationship and Clayton Copula for the age–strength relationship, revealing asymmetric tail dependence patterns invisible to conventional correlation analysis. The three-dimensional Copula model enables engineers to estimate compliance probability—the likelihood of concrete achieving target strength under specific mix designs and curing conditions. We propose an illustrative three-tier decision rule for construction quality management based on the compliance probability P: P ≥ 0.95 (high-confidence approval), 0.80 ≤ P < 0.95 (warning zone requiring enhanced monitoring), and P < 0.80 (high risk suggesting corrective actions such as mix adjustment or extended curing), noting that these thresholds can be recalibrated to project-specific risk tolerance and local specifications. This framework supports a paradigm shift from reactive “mix-then-test” quality control to proactive “predict-then-decide” construction management, providing quantitative risk assessment tools previously unavailable in deterministic prediction approaches.
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.