PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026PeerJ0 citationsOpen Access

Interactions between dense seasonal macroalgal mats and oysters on natural and constructed shellfish reefs

CSCarter S. SmithJRJustin T. RidgeSVStephanie R. Valdez

Key Points

  • This research investigates how seasonal macroalgal mats interact with oysters and their ecological implications on reefs.
  • Conducted an observational field survey of oyster reefs.
  • Performed two manipulative field experiments to assess algal dynamics.
  • Measured algal cover on constructed vs. natural oyster reefs.
  • Analyzed the relationship between oysters and algal cover dynamics.
  • Macroalgal mats covered up to 100% of reef areas, peaking in February and March.
  • Algal cover was significantly higher on constructed reefs compared to natural reefs.
  • Dead oyster mimics supported more algae than live oysters, indicating substrate provisioning is crucial.
  • No significant impact of macroalgae on oyster abundance or growth was observed.

Abstract

Oysters are important coastal foundation species that provide valuable hard substrate for the recruitment of epibiotic organisms in environments otherwise dominated by soft sediment. Yet, their interactions with epibionts are relatively understudied. Despite the proliferation of macroalgal mats across the Southeastern United States in winter months, the relationship between oysters ( Crassostrea virginica ) and seasonal macroalgae is poorly understood. We conducted an observational field survey and two manipulative field experiments to document seasonal macroalgal dynamics on intertidal oyster reefs and to better understand the interaction between the oysters and algae. We found that algal mats in North Carolina were primarily composed of two genera, Ulva and Ectocarpus , which together reached extremely high cover (up to 100%) over large areas of reef. Macroalgae appeared in January and declined in May, with peak cover in February and March. Algal cover was significantly higher on constructed oyster reefs vs . natural oyster reefs. Our field experiments showed that algal cover was significantly higher on dead oyster mimics vs . live oysters, suggesting that the primary mechanism of algal facilitation is associated with the provisioning of hard substrate rather than fertilization. Reciprocally, we found no significant effects of macroalgae on oyster abundance or growth, likely due to relatively low algal cover in the experimental treatments. With a predicted proliferation of macroalgae under global change, our study highlights the important role that intertidal oyster reefs play in providing substrate for macroalgae, but more research on this key species interaction in intertidal areas of the Southeastern United States is needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011b32ccff479cfe58909https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20682
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper