Research demonstrates condition-wise gait sex classification accuracy under disturbances, suggesting improved robustness in real-world applications.
Skeleton-based gait sex classification can reduce reliance on appearance cues, yet its robustness under everyday walking disturbances remains under-quantified. Using PsyMo 2D pose sequences (90° side view), we render Common Objects in Context (COCO) keypoints into compact grayscale skeleton images, segment sequences into fixed-length 15-frame clips, and classify them with a 3D residual convolutional neural network (CNN) under a subject-wise split shared across four aggregated conditions: overall (A), occlusion/carrying disturbance (B), speed variation (C), and smartphone use (D). To avoid an arbitrary decision rule, we select a global operating threshold on the validation set by sweeping τ to maximize macro-F1, apply it unchanged to the held-out test set, and report a threshold-sensitivity check. Robustness is audited via condition-wise confusion matrices, subgroup precision/recall with 95% subject-level bootstrap confidence intervals, and subject-level probability overlap. To contextualize condition-dependent behavior, we quantify joint-group attribution shifts using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and examine a coarse arm-swing proxy under smartphone use. Subject-level test accuracy ranged from 0.761 to 0.870 across conditions A–D, with uncertainty summarized by 95% subject-level bootstrap confidence intervals; performance was lowest in B, with increased male→female errors. Overall, these results provide a transparent audit-and-interpretation framework for assessing skeleton-based gait sex classification under realistic walking perturbations in practical evaluation scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: