Retrospective cohort study links GRIm-score to lower cancer-specific survival and treatment completion in bladder cancer.
Background: Bladder cancer has diverse clinical outcomes, even in patients receiving curative treatment. Traditional clinicopathological indicators inadequately assess individual risk. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-score), which combines albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), is a prognostic factor for solid tumors; however, its role in bladder cancer remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with bladder cancer confirmed through histopathology received bladder-preserving multimodal therapy or radical cystectomy between October 2010 and April 2025. Participants were grouped into low (0–1) and high (2–3) GRImS categories for analysis. The study examined cancer-specific survival (CSS) and the secondary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment completion. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: A total of 89 patients participated in the study, with 73 (82.0%) and 16 (18.0%) having low and high GRIm-Score. During a median follow-up of 21.5 months, patients with a high GRIm-score had significantly shorter PFS, OS, and CSS than those with a low GRIm-score. The median CSS was 14.07 months for the high GRIm-score group and 27.75 months for the low GRIm-score group (p = 0.004). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high GRIm-score was independently associated with an increased cancer-specific mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–4.67; p = 0.005). Treatment completion was lower in the high GRIm-score group (31.3% vs. 64.4%, p = 0.031). Conclusions: The GRIm-score serves as an independent prognostic indicator for cancer-specific survival in patients with bladder cancer undergoing curative treatment and is related to therapy completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özyurt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: