PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Journal of Applied Biomechanics2 citations

Evaluating the Agreement of Markerless Motion Capture for Joint Angle Estimation in a Constrained Hallway Setting Compared With a Traditional Laboratory Setting

MRMatthew C. RuderVBVincenzo E. Di BaccoJOJereme Outerleys

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the agreement of markerless motion capture for joint angle estimation in constrained environments.
  • Compared a 10-camera markerless system in a hallway to an 8-camera traditional setup in a lab.
  • Twenty-five healthy adults performed tasks including standing, walking, and sit-to-stand at both locations.
  • Calculated kinematic data and assessed agreement using various statistical methods.
  • Excellent agreement for standing and walking outcomes (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ .97).
  • Root mean square error for standing and walking tasks was < 2.3° with mean differences < 1.1°.
  • Sit-to-stand tasks showed more variability but maintained high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > .96).

Abstract

Gait analysis is a valuable approach for understanding human movement, but the space and setup requirements of traditional marker-based systems can limit their use outside specialized laboratories. Markerless motion capture may provide a more flexible option, though its agreement in constrained environments compared with traditional spaces is not well established. This study compared a 10-camera markerless system deployed in a hallway with a traditional 8-camera laboratory setup. Twenty-five healthy adults (15 females, 10 males; age 34 16 y) completed quiet standing, 60 seconds of self-selected walking, and 5-repetition sit-to-stand tasks at both sites on the same day. Three-dimensional pose estimates were processed to calculate alignment during standing, lower-limb joint kinematics during walking, and trunk flexion during sit-to-stand. Agreement within and between sites was assessed using Pearson correlations, root mean square error, Bland Altman limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Standing and walking outcomes showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ .97; root mean square error .96). These findings indicate that a constrained markerless setup can yield kinematic data comparable to a laboratory arrangement, suggesting potential for broader use of markerless approaches in diverse environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ruder et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b3319b75e639e9b08154https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2025-0265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper