PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Poster Session II - A266 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN IBD: CURRENT EVIDENCE AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS

View Full Paper
CGCiarán GaltsAWA Wen

Key Points

  • The review aims to synthesize current evidence on the use of artificial intelligence in managing inflammatory bowel disease across various medical disciplines.
  • Conducted a narrative review combining systematic and narrative approaches.
  • Utilized databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from 2010 to September 2025.
  • Data extraction focused on AI model type, validation, and diagnostic accuracy.
  • AI systems using convolutional neural networks achieved over 90% accuracy in identifying IBD and grading severity.
  • Histology AI models predicted histologic remission with accuracies exceeding 90%, and postoperative recurrence models had AUCs of 0.98-0.99.
  • Radiomics and CNNs applied to imaging techniques achieved AUCs between 0.8-0.97 for differentiating IBD types and predicting surgical risks.

Abstract

Abstract Background The increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is impacting health care delivery across disciplines, including for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Deep learning and machine learning (especially CNNs and radiomics) can process endoscopic, histologic, imaging, and clinical data beyond human capacity. Given IBD’s complexity and dependence on multimodal evaluation, AI is well positioned to impact care in IBD. Aims We conducted a narrative review to synthesize and critically evaluate current evidence surrounding AI in IBD across endoscopy, histology, imaging, and clinical applications, highlighting key opportunities and limitations. Methods This review combined systematic and narrative approaches. A systematic approach was applied to established domains (endoscopy, histology, imaging) using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar (2010 through September 2025). A narrative approach covered emerging applications (digital biomarkers, clinical trials, drug discovery). Data extraction captured AI model type, validation, and diagnostic or predictive accuracy. Results A total of 72 studies were included in our review. Substantial evidence demonstrates AI’s efficacy in improving diagnostics and monitoring across endoscopy, histology, and imaging in IBD. Specifically, AI systems using CNNs in endoscopy achieved 90% accuracy for identifying IBD and grading severity, while reproducing indices (Mayo, UCEIS) with high agreement (κ values 0.8 and AUCs up to 0.97). In histology, CNN models achieved 90% accuracy for predicting histologic remission, and models for predicting postoperative CD recurrence achieved exceptional AUCs of 0.98 − 0.99. For imaging, radiomics and CNNs applied to CT, MRI, and IUS achieved AUCs of 0.8 − 0.97 for differentiating IBD types and predicting surgical risk, with IUS models detecting mucosal healing with an accuracy above 90%. AI tools can use biomarkers predicted hospitalization, surgery, and biologic response with AUCs of 0.7 − 0.9. Furthermore, AI reanalysis of UC trial videos improved sensitivity and reduced the necessary sample size by 50%, showing its expanding role in clinical trials and therapeutic advancement. Conclusions AI has robust applications in endoscopy, histology, and imaging, and expanding roles in personalized therapy and trial design. Challenges remain in data sharing, standardization, and external validation, but AI is likely to increasingly contribute to the care of IBD patients. Funding Agencies None

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Galts et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b3769b75e639e9b08322https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper