PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026European Journal of Human Genetics4 citationsOpen Access

Priority European strategies for sustainable access to high-quality genetic counselling in cancer: A Delphi study

JMJ. Matt McCraryEVEls Van ValckenborghDHDenis Horgan

Key Points

  • The project aims to identify priority strategies for sustainable access to genetic counselling in cancer care across Europe.
  • Conducted a Delphi survey with stakeholders from genetics, oncology, and patient advocacy across EU Member States.
  • Received a response rate of 62% from 124 invitations.
  • Participants rated 19 strategies on Importance, Urgency, and Feasibility over three phases.
  • Five strategies reached consensus for priority ratings: EU-wide genetic counsellor recognition, inclusion of genetics expertise in oncology guidelines, shared genetic counsellor registration, mandatory counselling reimbursement, and inclusion of genetics in oncology training.
  • These strategies provide a clear pathway for improving access to genetic counselling in cancer care.

Abstract

Abstract Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan is a substantial European Union (EU) investment into cancer prevention and treatment. Integration of genetic services towards personalised cancer prevention and care is a flagship of this plan. Genetic counselling is critical to this integration, facilitating informed patient decision making and improved clinical management. However, growing demands for genetic testing and concurrently increasing workforce shortages necessitate new strategies to equitably ensure sustainable access to counselling across the EU. This project aimed to inform future European activities by identifying priority European strategies for addressing common European genetic literacy, workforce, and reimbursement barriers to genetic counselling in cancer noted in prior work. A Delphi survey was conducted, with genetics, oncology, and patient stakeholders invited from all EU Member States. The response rate was 62% (124 total invitations). Over three phases, 77 participants – 28 geneticists; 14 oncologists; 18 genetic counsellors; 16 patient representatives; 1 otherwise qualified expert – rated 19 strategies according to their Importance, Urgency, and Feasibility and selected their top three priority strategies. Five strategies met pre-defined consensus thresholds and received a clear plurality of priority ratings: (1) EU-wide genetic counsellor recognition; (2) Including genetics expertise in oncology guideline creation; (3) Shared EU genetic counsellor registration/education with legal weight; (4) Mandatory counselling reimbursement when clinical guidelines are met; (5) Mandatory inclusion of genetics in oncology fellowship/continuing education. Results provide a roadmap of European actions which promise to sustainably improve access to genetic counselling in cancer care. Upcoming and ongoing EU projects promise to advance their implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCrary et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b3ca9b75e639e9b08a02https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02015-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper