Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncovers the automorphism groups of commuting involution graphs in PSL 2(q), suggesting structural insights in group theory.
Given a finite group ๐บ and a conjugacy class of involutions ๐ of ๐บ, we define the commuting involution graph <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="script">C</m:mi> <m:mo>โข</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> C(G,X) to be the graph with vertex set ๐ and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>โ</m:mo> <m:mi>X</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> x,yโ X adjacent if and only if <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>โ </m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> xโ y and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>โข</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>โข</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> xy=yx . In this paper, the automorphism group of the graph <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="script">C</m:mi> <m:mo>โข</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> C(G,X) is determined when <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>PSL</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>โก</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>q</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> G=PSLโ(q) .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: