Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved knowledge and confidence in midwives, suggesting effective training methods.
Background: Midwives play a central role in maternal and newborn outcomes, yet many face gaps in clinical competence and confidence because of limited training. Method: This quasi-experimental study evaluated the Mastering Integrated Development for Women's and Infants' Focused Excellence (M.I.D.W.I.F.E.) program. A total of 32 midwives were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention included interactive lectures, simulation-based learning, and a supervised clinical practicum. Outcomes (knowledge, clinical competency, and confidence) were assessed at baseline, posttraining, and at 3-month follow-up with validated tools. Results: The intervention group showed significant improvements in knowledge (from 80.19% to 86.88%, p < .001, Cohen's d = 2.8), clinical competency (91.3% vs. 81.4%, p < .001, d = 3.7), and confidence across all domains ( p < .001, d > 2.0). Confidence gains were sustained at follow-up. Conclusion: The M.I.D.W.I.F.E. program effectively enhanced knowledge, skills, and confidence. Structured, simulation-based training with supervised practice holds promise for improving the quality of midwifery care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alreshidi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: