PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Materials2 citationsOpen Access

In-Plane Dynamic Crushing Response and Energy Absorption of a Novel Auxetic Honeycomb

XLXinliang LiBSBai-Xuan SongPJPeng Jia

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the dynamic crushing responses of novel auxetic honeycomb structures and understand their mechanical properties under varying velocities.
  • Developed a new auxetic honeycomb structure with an arc-shaped design.
  • Conducted theoretical modeling and finite element analyses of the structures.
  • Examined stress–strain curves to analyze mechanical property relationships.
  • Observed increases in plateau stress and specific energy absorption with rising crushing velocity.
  • Identified a stronger negative Poisson’s ratio effect in the new auxetic structure.
  • Found three distinct stages in the stress-strain curves at low crushing velocities.

Abstract

A novel auxetic honeycomb (RSSHR) is developed by introducing the arc-shaped structure into the re-entrant star-shaped honeycomb (RSSH). Based on theoretical models and finite element methods, the dynamic crushing responses of RSSH and RSSHR plate (RSSHP and RSSHRP) structures are investigated to elucidate the dependence of plateau stress, negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR), deformed shape and specific energy absorption (SEA) on crushing velocity. The stress–strain curves of two types of structures are calculated to analyze configuration–mechanical property relationships. The results exhibit that the plateau stress and SEA of the RSSHP and RSSHRP structures increase as the crushing velocity increases. Owing to the stress-mitigating effect of the arc-shaped structure, the RSSHRP structure exhibits a stronger NPR effect. And the SEA of the RSSHRP structure is higher than that of the RSSHP structure. In addition, it is also found that at low crushing velocity, the stress–strain curves of the two structures exhibit three distinct stages: the elastic stage (I), the stress plateau stage (II) and the densification stage (III). During the crushing process, there are three deformed shapes. They are the global deformed shape, the local deformed shape and the layer-by-layer deformed shape.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b4139b75e639e9b08fe2https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040716
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper