PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research1 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Recurrence and Survival According to Treatment Paradigm Shifts

View Full Paper
JKJeongyun KimDSDong Hoon SuhKKKidong Kim

Key Points

  • To assess oncologic outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer patients amid evolving treatment paradigms.
  • Retrospective cohort study design
  • Included patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2020
  • Grouped patients by diagnosis period
  • Analyzed overall survival and progression-free survival using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses
  • Overall survival improved from 64.0% to 82.5% in advanced-stage patients between periods
  • Greater use of interval debulking surgery and first-line chemotherapy in 2009-2013
  • Residual disease after interval debulking surgery linked to poorer outcomes (hazard ratio 2.94)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate oncologic outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) amid evolving surgical and systemic therapy paradigms. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with EOC from June 2003 to December 2020 at a single tertiary center, grouped by diagnosis period. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 763 patients were classified as 2003–2008 (Group 1, n = 101), 2009–2013 (Group 2, n = 207), and 2014–2020 (Group 3, n = 455), reflecting changes in cytoreductive surgery and targeted therapies (bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors). Early‐stage diagnoses increased over time without statistical significance (Stage I–II: Group 1, 37.6% vs. Group 3, 46.6%; p = 0.200). Group 2 showed greater use of interval debulking surgery (IDS), higher complete cytoreduction rates, and more first‐line chemotherapy cycles (all p < 0.001). Group 3 represented the introduction of targeted therapies ( p < 0.001 for both). IDS with residual (< 1 cm) was associated with poorer outcomes than complete/optimal primary debulking surgery (PDS) (hazard ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval 1.5–5.8). Despite unchanged PFS, the 5‐year OS improved from 64.0% to 82.5% among patients with advanced‐stage disease ( p = 0.024). Conclusions Over two decades, with the advent of targeted therapies, complete cytoreduction (especially in PDS) has increased. Although the use of IDS also increased, residual disease (< 1 cm) after IDS was associated with poorer outcomes. While PFS remained unchanged, 5‐year OS significantly improved among patients with advanced‐stage disease diagnosed in the most recent period.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b42c9b75e639e9b09004https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70192
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper