Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort evaluates outcomes of endoscopic resection for large non-pedunculated colon polyps, indicating high success rates.
Background Endoscopic resection has revolutionized the management of large (≥ 20 mm) non-pedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) with international data demonstrating its efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. Canadian outcome data from tertiary resection programs remains limited Aims Evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic resection of LNPCPs in a Canadian tertiary referral program. Methods Consecutive adult patients referred for the management of a LNPCP were enrolled in a prospective multi-centre cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05402696). Endoscopic modality selection (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR], cold snare resection [CSR], or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) was at the discretion of the endoscopist. The primary outcome was technical success (removal of all polypoid tissue at index resection). Secondary outcomes included peri-procedural adverse events (intra-procedural perforation [IPP], clinically significant post-endoscopic resection bleeding [CSPEB], delayed perforation), and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Results From 06/2022 – 10/2025, 1138 large colorectal lesions were enrolled; 38 did not undergo endoscopic resection and 97 were located in the rectum. Ultimately 1003 LNPCPs were included for analysis. Median patient age was 68 years (IQR 61-73 years), and 45.4% of patients were female. Median lesion size was 25 mm (IQR 20-35mm) with 46.9% located in the cecum/ascending colon. The predominant morphology was Paris 0-IIA (66.1%) with 44.8% demonstrating granular topography. On histopathology, 62.5% were adenomas and 30.6% were sessile serrated lesions. Overall cancer frequency was 3.4%. Predominant resection modalities included piecemeal EMR (55.4%), CSR (26.3%), and ESD (9.5%). Technical success was achieved in 98.3%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 3.0% and CSPEB occurred in 4.7% with no delayed perforations. Hospital admission was required in 7.5% of patients, primarily due to CSPEB. Recurrence at SC1 was identified in 2.3%. Conclusions Our findings support that tertiary tissue resection programs demonstrate high performance in minimally invasive endoscopic resection for LNPCPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimuddin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: