Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparison of simulation strategies reveals the importance of potential fluctuations in PCET rate constants, indicating significant implications for electrocatalyst design.
Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions are core elementary steps in electrochemical energy conversion processes. Accurate quantification of their rate constants is crucial for understanding reaction mechanisms and designing electrocatalysts. However, developing appropriate methods to treat an exact grand canonical (GC) constant potential condition remains challenging and is still under debate. Here we compare two simulation strategies of introducing applied potentials: one incorporates microstates' electrochemical potential fluctuations to rigorously sample the GC ensemble distribution, while another fixes the potential by iteratively adjusting electron numbers for each microstate. Using the Volmer reaction at Pt(111) surface as a model system, and employing the Bennett-Chandler approach to calculate rate constants, we find that these two different approaches yield distinct thermal activations and dynamic recrossing behaviors, leading to non-negligible differences in predicted reaction rate constants. Our study highlights the criticality and necessity of capturing instantaneous potential fluctuations for rigorous and reliable dynamic simulations of electrochemical PCET steps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: