Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Curriculum learning enhances generalization accuracy in computational fluid dynamics, suggesting improved efficiency in simulations.
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful surrogates for mesh-based computational fluid dynamics, but training them on high-resolution unstructured meshes with hundreds of thousands of nodes remains prohibitively expensive. We study a coarse-to-fine curriculum that accelerates convergence by first training on very coarse meshes and then progressively introducing medium and high resolutions (up to 3×105 nodes). Unlike multiscale GNN architectures, the model itself is unchanged; only the fidelity of the training data varies over time. We achieve comparable generalization accuracy while reducing total wall-clock time by up to 50%. Furthermore, on datasets where our model lacks the capacity to learn the underlying physics, using curriculum learning enables it to break through plateaus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garnier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: