PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Activity and Damage Indices for Sjögren’s Disease

EPE. PortierMBMaxime BeydonSBSimon J. Bowman

Key Points

  • The research aims to address the challenges in assessing disease activity and damage in Sjögren’s disease (SjD).
  • Review existing indices like ESSDAI and ESSPRI for assessing activity.
  • Introduce composite measures such as STAR and CRESS for comprehensive evaluation.
  • Discuss limitations of current measures in capturing disease damage.
  • ESSDAI and ESSPRI provide different aspects of disease activity but are insufficient alone.
  • Composite tools integrate multiple parameters for a better overall assessment.
  • A validated method to specifically evaluate damage in SjD remains an unmet need.

Abstract

Primary Sjögren’s disease (SjD) is a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations, ranging from isolated glandular dysfunction to multisystem involvement and severe complications. This variability complicates disease management, particularly the assessment of disease activity and long-term outcomes. Disease activity in SjD encompasses both systemic manifestations and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) remains the standard for systemic activity, while the ESSPRI complements these scores by capturing subjective symptom burden. These tools have limitations because they do not evaluate the same manifestations of SjD and may therefore respond differently to treatment. Thus, composite outcomes such as the Sjögren’s Tool for Assessing Response (STAR) and the Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren Syndrome (CRESS) have been developed. They integrate improvements in ClinESSDAI, PROs, biological parameters and objective dryness, providing a more comprehensive measure of disease activity. Assessment of damage, defined as irreversible sequelae, remains an unmet need in SjD. Damage is a reflection of the natural evolution of the disease, and is also relevant to measuring the impact and health economic effects of therapeutic interventions. Existing measures, including cumulative ESSDAI, track longitudinal activity and reflect the severity of the disease, but do not specifically capture damage. In summary; SjD assessment requires complementary tools for systemic activity and PROs, with composite scores a recent innovation. An important remaining gap is a validated method to evaluate damage, essential to fully evaluate disease progression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Portier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b4ad9b75e639e9b09a28https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041478
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper