Across scientific domains, limitations in cross-disciplinary understanding often arise not from disagreement about observed phenomena, but from differences in how those observations are structurally framed. This work introduces Phase–Layer Lenses, a non-predictive, descriptive observational scaffold for situating independently studied systems at comparable structural positions—without unification, reduction, or causal integration. Using three distinct domains—physical flight dynamics, stepwise generative processes in information physics, and distributed ecological interactions—we show that phases such as accumulation, constraint-induced lock-in, structured persistence, collapse, and reconfiguration are independently reported across fields governed by fundamentally different formalisms. Rather than asserting shared mechanisms or universal principles, these phases are aligned as observational positions at which similar types of behavior emerge under constraint. The contribution of this framework is neither explanatory nor predictive. Instead, it is organizational: it enables heterogeneous descriptions to be placed on a common comparative table while preserving disciplinary autonomy. By doing so, it supports cross-domain dialogue—particularly around instability, transition, and breakdown—without imposing theoretical hierarchy or interpretive unity. No generalization beyond this observational role is claimed.
Hinano Kimura (2026) studied this question.