Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This peer review scheme enhances computational reproducibility in psychology researchers, suggesting improved research integrity.
Open science and reproducible practices are becoming increasingly normalised in psychological science. This scheme aims to help take and apply these principles further, giving the opportunity for researchers in the psychology department at Exeter University to have their work checked for computational reproducibility. This work is a peer-to-peer version of the reproducibility check scheme which exists at the University of Sussex at: Baykova, R., Dienes, Z., & Colling, L. J. (2026, February 12). Ensuring the computational reproducibility of to-be-submitted psychology papers. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DR35V
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlie Oldfield (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: