Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates serum β-Klotho's correlation with inflammation and fibrosis indices in chronic HBV patients, suggesting its potential as a non-invasive biomarker.
Background Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection causes significant morbidity. Liver biopsy, the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, is invasive, highlighting the need for non-invasive biomarkers. β-Klotho, a transmembrane protein, may be released during hepatocyte injury. This study aimed to evaluate serum β-Klotho in treatment-naïve chronic HBV patients and its correlation with inflammation and fibrosis indices. Methods Sixty-seven treatment-naïve HBV patients were divided by viral load (<10⁵ IU/mL, n=34; ≥10⁵ IU/mL, n=33), with 18 healthy controls. Serum β-Klotho was measured via ELISA. Inflammation indices (SII, SIRI, PLR, NLR, LMR, PNR) and non-invasive fibrosis indices (APRI, GAPI, API, PAPAS, others) were calculated. Spearman correlation and ROC analysis were performed. Results Median serum β-Klotho levels tended to be higher in patients with increased HBV DNA levels; however, no statistically significant difference or correlation was observed ( p =0.052; p =0.813). Positive correlations were found with SIRI (r=0.389, p =0.001) and GAPI (r=0.270, p =0.027), negative with LMR (r=-0.269, p =0.028) and PNR (r=-0.322, p =0.008). ROC analysis showed limited diagnostic value (AUC=0.674, p =0.024), with high specificity (94.4%) but low sensitivity (46.3%). No correlation with fibrosis stage was observed. Conclusions Serum β-Klotho tends to increase with viral load, reflecting hepatocellular injury and systemic inflammation rather than established fibrosis. It may serve as a novel non-invasive damage-associated biomarker in chronic HBV, though diagnostic sensitivity is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: