Why the study?
Does 64-section CT coronary angiography improve the depiction rate of myocardial bridging compared to conventional coronary angiography?
Does 64-section CT coronary angiography improve the depiction rate of myocardial bridging compared to conventional coronary angiography?
64-section CT coronary angiography provides a higher depiction rate of myocardial bridging than conventional angiography and demonstrates that systolic compression correlates with the depth of the tunneled segment.
May improve myocardial bridging detection with 64-section CT; leaves open impact on management or outcomes.
The depiction rate of MB is greater with 64-section CT coronary angiography than with conventional coronary angiography. The degree of systolic compression of MB significantly correlates with tunneled segment depth but not length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leschka et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: