Evaluates longitudinal placements' effectiveness in enhancing clinical preparedness, highlighting barriers to scalability.
Findings align with international literature advocating longitudinal placements as a means of enhancing clinical preparedness. However, this study highlights systemic barriers to sustainability, including placement funding and infrastructure. Limitations include potential bias from selective site participation, single-institution scope, and reliance on self-reported student data. Broader adoption will require investment in supervision models, MDT training, and resource planning to support scalable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hardisty et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: