PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2005378 citations

Cuff-less and Noninvasive Measurements of Arterial Blood Pressure by Pulse Transit Time

View Full Paper
CPCarmen C. Y. PoonYZYuan‐Ting Zhang

Structured PICO

Does cuff-less measurement by pulse transit time accurately estimate blood pressure compared to standard cuff-based methods in human subjects?

P
Population
85 subjects, aged 57+/-29 years, including 36 males and 39 hypertensives
I
Intervention
Cuff-less and noninvasive measurement of arterial blood pressure by pulse transit time
C
Comparator
Average of blood pressure readings reported by an experienced registered nurse and a clinically approved automatic BP meter
O
Outcome
Difference between estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure and reference blood pressuresurrogate

Cuff-less blood pressure measurement using pulse transit time shows promising accuracy compared to standard methods, highlighting its potential for wearable home monitoring devices.

Abstract

The current blood pressure (BP) measurement devices are mostly built on the principle of auscultation, oscillometry or tonometry, all of which use an inflatable cuff to occlude or unload the artery. The need of a cuff in these devices limits the further reduction in size and power consumption, and restricts the frequency and ease of their usage. Therefore, this study aims to develop a cuff-less and noninvasive technique for measuring BP by pulse transit time. The technique was evaluated on 85 subjects, aged 57+/-29 yrs., including 36 males and 39 hypertensives, over an average period of 6.4 wks. A total of 999 pairs of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimations were made. The average of BP readings reported by an experienced registered nurse and those obtained from a clinically approved automatic BP meter was used as reference. It is found that the estimated SBP and DBP differed from the reference BP by 0.6+/-9.8mmHg and 0.9+/-5.6mmHg respectively. When compared to the AAMI requirement (5+/-8mmHg for both SBP and DBP estimation), the results suggest that the cuff-less technology has great potential to be developed into wearable devices that are useful in self BP monitoring for home healthcare and eventually in clinical diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Poon et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69952bd16d04fdc8c5d4a42fhttps://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2005.1615827
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper