Key result
TAVR fails to reduce 6-year mortality or stroke vs surgery but increases reinterventions driven by AR.
Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement reduce the composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis?
RCT (n=1,414)
randomized
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement reduce the composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis?
Effect estimate: Difference 2.8% (95% CI -1.9 to 7.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 23.3% vs 20.4%
p-value: p=0.43
At 6 years, TAVR and surgery had similar rates of mortality or disabling stroke in low-risk patients, but TAVR was associated with higher reintervention rates driven by aortic regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TAVR remains reasonable alternative to SAVR in low-risk AS; extends RCT evidence to 6 years despite higher reintervention.
BACKGROUND: The Evolut Low Risk trial enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk. Annual follow-up is planned for 10 years, evaluating the composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke and key secondary endpoints. OBJECTIVES: Our prespecified objective was to report the 6-year clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgery from the Evolut Low Risk trial. Given an increase in reintervention rates at 6 years, we performed additional analyses in available 7-year data. METHODS: Low-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were randomized to TAVR or surgery from 2016-2019. Prespecified analyses at 6 years included annual follow-up of clinical outcomes reported as Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank test. Because the trial enrolled patients over several years, at the time of data lock, a majority of patients had completed 7-year follow-up. Given an increased reintervention rate at 6 years in the TAVR arm, we performed additional analysis of 7-year data available at the time of the database lock. Reintervention rates are reported as cumulative incidence. RESULTS: A total of 1,414 patients underwent an attempted implantation (730 TAVR, 684 surgery). At 6 years, the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke was 23.3% for TAVR and 20.4% for surgery (difference: 2.8% [95% CI: -1.9% to 7.6%]; P = 0.43). All-cause mortality with vital status sweep at 6 years was 23.3% (95% CI: 20.6%-26.4%) for TAVR and 20.2% (95% CI: 17.4%-23.3%) for surgery (P = 0.24). The reintervention rate at 6 years was 5.5% for TAVR and 3.3% for surgery (sHR: 1.66 [95% CI: 0.96-2.86]; P = 0.07). Using available 7-year follow-up (555 TAVR and 480 surgery), the reintervention rate for TAVR was 9.8% and for surgery was 6.0% (sHR: 1.68 [95% CI: 1.10-2.58]; P = 0.02). In the TAVR and surgery groups, the rate of reintervention for regurgitation was 5.6% vs 1.6% (sHR: 3.39 [95% CI: 1.62-7.07]; P < 0.001) and the rate of reintervention for stenosis was 3.6% vs 3.5% (sHR: 1.14 [95% CI: 0.61-2.15]; P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The 6-year results from the Evolut Low Risk trial show no significant difference in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke. At 6 and 7 years, the TAVR arm had a higher reintervention rate compared with surgery, driven by an increased incidence of aortic regurgitation. (Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients; NCT02701283).
Forrest et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at low surgical risk (n=1,414). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgery was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke (Difference 2.8%, 95% CI -1.9 to 7.6, p=0.43). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement resulted in no significant difference in all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 6 years compared with surgery (23.3% vs 20.4%; P=0.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: