Qualitative study examines experiences of hip osteoarthritis patients in an exercise and weight loss intervention, suggesting positive outcomes with clinician support.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of people with hip osteoarthritis who participated in a lifestyle intervention involving exercise and, for those with overweight or obesity, an additional weight loss diet. DESIGN: Qualitative study underpinned by Interpretive Description paradigm embedded in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Semi-structured individual interviews with 20 people with hip osteoarthritis who completed a 6-month physiotherapist-prescribed exercise program and, for those with overweight/obesity, an additional dietitian-prescribed weight loss diet (very low energy diet). We conducted inductive reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes and sub-themes from the data, with the overarching goal of informing clinical practice and future research. RESULTS: Just over half (55%) of participants completed the combined exercise and diet program, while 45% (ineligible for the diet program) completed the exercise program only. Five themes were developed: (1) clinician guidance was paramount to success (provided accountability; provided encouragement and support); (2) ease and convenience of program (weight loss diet and meal replacements; video consultations); (3) challenges with exercise program (difficult exercises; cuff weights were difficult to use; adherence was a challenge for some; preference for some in-person contact with physiotherapist); (4) useful resources; (5) favourable outcomes (reduced hip pain and improved mobility; weight loss; increased knowledge and confidence). CONCLUSION: Participants had positive experiences with the intervention, particularly valuing clinician support, its overall ease and convenience, and the useful resources. Some found engaging with the exercise program to be challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawford et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: