Evaluation compares multi-pretrained deep learning fusion strategies for histopathology classification, indicating significant performance improvements.
Histopathological image analysis remains the cornerstone of cancer diagnosis; however, manual assessment is challenged by stain variability, differences in imaging magnification, and complex morphological patterns. The proposed multi-pretrained deep learning fusion (MPDLF) approach combines two widely used CNN architectures: ResNet50, which captures deeper semantic representations, and VGG16, which extracts fine-grained details. This work differs from previous fusion studies by providing a controlled evaluation of early, intermediate, and late fusion for integrating two pretrained CNN backbones (ResNet50 and VGG16) under single-modality histopathology constraints. To isolate the fusion effect, identical training settings are used across three public H&E datasets. Early fusion achieved the best test performance for the two primary tasks reported here: breast cancer binary classification (accuracy = 0.9070, 95% CI: 0.8742–0.9404; AUC = 0.9707, 95% CI: 0.9541–0.9844) and renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC) five-class grading (accuracy = 0.8792, 95% CI: 0.8529–0.9041; AUC (OvR, macro) = 0.9895, 95% CI: 0.9859–0.9927). Future work will extend these experiments to additional magnification levels (100×, 200×, and 400×) for breast cancer histopathology images and explore advanced hybrid fusion strategies across different histopathology datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alshohoumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: