Novel hybrid model improves emotion recognition accuracy in EEG signals, suggesting advancements in affective computing.
Emotion recognition using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is a growing focus in affective computing due to its wide-ranging applications in human-computer interaction. However, many existing studies process EEG signals as independent one-dimensional time series, overlooking its multidimensional structure and dynamic segment relationships. To address this, we propose a novel Hybrid Graph Attention Network (H-GAT) model that integrates Graph Attention Networks (GAT), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Our model effectively captures multi-dimensional dependencies in EEG data by modeling functional relationships between EEG segments, extracting local temporal patterns, and learning temporal dynamics. The EEG signals are transformed into a graph representation, where the adjacency matrix is generated based on dynamic similarity measures, computed by evaluating the Pearson correlation between segment-wise feature vectors. This enables the GAT module to effectively model the functional relationships across EEG segments. Additionally, a CNN layer extracts local temporal patterns, while LSTM captures the overall temporal dynamics. These features are then fused and passed through a fully connected layer for classification. Extensive experiments conducted on the SEED and DEAP datasets demonstrate the superiority of our model, achieving an average accuracy of 97.89 ± 0.50% for binary, 96.67 ± 0.72% for ternary, on SEED data, and 93.09 ± 1.02% for valence and 93.93 ± 1.14% for arousal on the DEAP dataset. These results not only highlight the power of hybrid neural architectures but also demonstrate the model's transformative potential to progress emotion recognition, making it a robust, and highly interpretable solution in the rapidly advancing field of affective computing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: